-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Which Dum-Dum posted this?
- Thread starter stoyan79
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
I recall that we had someone join not all that long ago under the name INGunOwner who has not had any activity since setting up the account. No posts of any kind. I can't say that it is the same person, but does seem to be a good place to start looking.
Justin Case
Sharpshooter
The member list shows him joining on 11/3/12. He hasn't posted anything on INGO.
Justin Case
Sharpshooter
Right! And you were counting on today being the end of the world so you thought you could get by with it.
Right! And you were counting on today being the end of the world so you thought you could get by with it.
Dang Mayans and their crappy prophecy.
onetwoonetwo
Marksman
geronimojoe85
Master
- Nov 16, 2009
- 3,716
- 48
That had to be a troll. I can't even imagine the characters that proclaim they won't be hurt because they only use 1911's or revolvers doing this!
And be sure, they have their heads in the sand if they believe the bamiinites won't be after them one day too.
And be sure, they have their heads in the sand if they believe the bamiinites won't be after them one day too.
I read CNN all the time. I like to know what the enemy is up to.
He must think that by giving up a "less important" right (mag capacity), we will preserve a more important right (no awb). Giving up a constitution right is a loss on any level and only opens the door for more to be taken from us.
He must think that by giving up a "less important" right (mag capacity), we will preserve a more important right (no awb). Giving up a constitution right is a loss on any level and only opens the door for more to be taken from us.
The magazine debate is so bunk.
I mean, if someone could only have 10rnd magazines, I would think they would just carry a backpack full of them, and try to use cover more. Yes they have to reload more, but if they have a backpack full of them, they'd just drop them and move on.
I mean, if someone could only have 10rnd magazines, I would think they would just carry a backpack full of them, and try to use cover more. Yes they have to reload more, but if they have a backpack full of them, they'd just drop them and move on.
netsecurity
Shooter
Dude there was a picture submitted by INGunowner on one of CNN's top stories today.
There have had to be at least 50 compromise threads on here about the exact same thing...people talking about how we should restrict magazine capacity or some other idiotic idea that won't do anything but take away rights and open the door for more rights to be taken.
The magazine debate is so bunk.
I mean, if someone could only have 10rnd magazines, I would think they would just carry a backpack full of them, and try to use cover more. Yes they have to reload more, but if they have a backpack full of them, they'd just drop them and move on.
This is just MY thought, or question..... IF you are in a "gun free" zone, does it make any difference, on how many rounds your mag., holds... a "gun free" zone, no one is going to shoot you, so you could take your time changing mags...... NO, I do NOT want another "ban" of ANY KIND ..... would MUCH rather see 2A, stand strong... someone, armed in school ....
