FOr someone who doesn't care, you sure seem to make sure you read and respond to my posts.Nor I yours.
FOr someone who doesn't care, you sure seem to make sure you read and respond to my posts.Nor I yours.
FOr someone who doesn't care, you sure seem to make sure you read and respond to my posts.
only for a minute
Napolitano characterized the resistance shown by Bundy supporters as a clear example of how Americans feel, “enough is enough with the federal government, we’re drawing a line in the sand right here – and it drew people from all around the country who basically said ‘quit your heavy handed theft of property and act like you’re a normal litigant and not God almighty’.”
Exactly. It's a good read about Napolitano's take on the situation that took place and the Judge makes some good points.He is absolutely right. Frankly, I don't really care if Bundy is right or wrong, our government has no right to handle the situation as they did.
I think Judge Napolitano has got it right here and I agree with him about why the supporters showed up and that it was to confront the heavy hand of the feds. Doesn't matter what Bundy's litigious matters were. They showed up because they are fed up.
» Judge Napolitano: Ranch Rebellion Was Americans? ?Line in the Sand? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
Agreed. I do think they were in the wrong for burning land that wasn't theirs. I think a fine and loss of land lease would have been more appropriate. It wasn't an act of terrorism.Use of anti-terrorism laws on ranchers burning off brush? This takes 'dumber than owl sh*t' to a new low.
Agreed. I do think they were in the wrong for burning land that wasn't theirs. I think a fine and loss of land lease would have been more appropriate. It wasn't an act of terrorism.
I acually laughed out loud when I read the bit about hoping Obama would give them clemency.