I do have add though the pregnant woman target I was sent years ago looked much more nefarious than this current rendition, it was like she was in an alley or something if I remember correctly.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
DHS Target Supplier Includes Pregnant Women & Old Men For Target Practic Read m
- Thread starter miguel
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jbt war on terror
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I do have add though the pregnant woman target I was sent years ago looked much more nefarious than this current rendition, it was like she was in an alley or something if I remember correctly.
Shooting granny is probably easier than tackling her like the JBT did in that New Orleans video from Katrina.
- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
Good point. All they need is to add a target of two small hispanic women in a pickup truck as viewed from behind.
next time i go to the range im gonna shoot at these targets
Why do I get the feeling that some people who would consider having the police shooting at targets that look like us 'realistic training' but would consider targets designed for people who look like us shooting back when opened fire upon for no good reason to be appalling? What's good for the goose is good for the gander, and after all, it's only paper, right? Never mind that the apparent goal is desensitizing police of what reservations they may have about shooting people in situations that smack of defending their homes and families rather than crimes in progress.
Bunnykid68
Grandmaster
Was it a pregnant woman with a gun pointed at you or a pregnant woman being held hostage?
That's great 
The titles of the targets in Rambone's post even say "No More Hesitation". What could possibly go wrong with acclimating people to shooting little kids and little old ladies in their bedrooms?
The titles of the targets in Rambone's post even say "No More Hesitation". What could possibly go wrong with acclimating people to shooting little kids and little old ladies in their bedrooms?
Sfrandolph
Shooter
This is truly disturbing and begs the question "What the hell is wrong with those in power in government?"
No way you can shoot this guy. He already fired it up on his balcony. Perfectly harmless now.
Is it just me or does that look like rust in those barrels?
Isn't this the double barreled shotgun that 'Ol Joe Biden suggested we use for self defense?
No way you can shoot this guy. He already fired it up on his balcony. Perfectly harmless now.
- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
As I see it, the primary result of such 'training' is desensitizing officers to inhibitions against shooting the people they are ostensibly protecting--starting the metamorphosis from public servants to public masters suitable for a police state.
1. You will notice that those in the featured targets are pictured in the context of defending their personal space. You do not see people in such situations unless you just kicked in their doors or have accosted them outside. If this happens, then you are the problem, not them.
2. I can understand that criminals do not have numbered squares or ovals on their chests and do not necessarily look like roughnecks from the worst bar in town, but honestly, this is over the top. Once again, this appears suitable training for preemptive home invasions that channel thpoughts of such paradises as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union and/or other combloc states.
3. Are we training our police to be keepers of the police or killing machines? So far as I can tell at the present, the police have looser rules of engagement than do our troops in combat. This is a major problem, and we see before us yet another example of reinforcing this pattern.
1. You will notice that those in the featured targets are pictured in the context of defending their personal space. You do not see people in such situations unless you just kicked in their doors or have accosted them outside. If this happens, then you are the problem, not them.
2. I can understand that criminals do not have numbered squares or ovals on their chests and do not necessarily look like roughnecks from the worst bar in town, but honestly, this is over the top. Once again, this appears suitable training for preemptive home invasions that channel thpoughts of such paradises as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union and/or other combloc states.
3. Are we training our police to be keepers of the police or killing machines? So far as I can tell at the present, the police have looser rules of engagement than do our troops in combat. This is a major problem, and we see before us yet another example of reinforcing this pattern.
^^^^^ Exactly!!!
Hey if you dont like the targets then look for something else. Go buy your round bullseye targets and shoot at them.
They are for specialized scenario purposes. It's not as if Officers shoot at those targets daily. Most of their training is done on silhouettes. Also, If you had looked farther you would see there are a whole myriad of scenarios from which to choose from. Including Active shooter, hostage, barricaded and as well Shoot-No Shoot targets.
To say shooting scenario targets like this desensitizes Officers and teaches them to kill people is just asinine. Typical rhetoric coming from someone who most likely has ZERO experience in civilian Law Enforcement.
Dont knock what you dont know.
And for the record, If some kidnapper had my child hostage and was pointing a gun I would pray to God the Police Officer on scene was well trained and made a well placed justified shot.
Well, depending on who you want to believe, lately it has come out that there is a litmus test being given to members of the military pertaining to their attitude about firing on civilians.
The Obama Civilian Military “Litmus Test” For Military Leadership Compliance… | The Last Refuge
Site Supporter
Staff online
-
Cameramonkeywww.thechosen.tv
Members online
- jsharmon7
- gryphnrider
- Capvideo
- BR8818
- 10mmfan
- db308
- KMaC
- Bosshoss
- outnumbered
- res04
- tjones
- amboy49
- Squid556
- FFJakeT
- AlienRayGun
- Shay
- Meatstick
- sescbo
- blain
- Gabriel
- morve80
- dboz
- daddyusmaximus
- Percolater
- Titanium_Frost
- Bluehazemay
- Iurobz
- tmschuller
- lane440
- pokersamurai
- indyblue
- Dechrissen
- Hassiebawked
- Njorris
- tca1352
- snorko
- Belleduke
- F1Fanatic
- KeithVeal92
- 10mm
- Sloshooter
- tangleridgeslim
- qoller
- macolesby
- BehindBlueI's
- Gunguy317
- Cameramonkey
- pharmboy
- model1994
- Goodcat
