Give him this. Assuming he can read and comprehend. Keep in mind there are none so blind as those who won't see.
J. Neil Schulman: The Unabridged Second Amendment
THAT is the ABSOLUTE BEST, I have ever seen !!!!!
Give him this. Assuming he can read and comprehend. Keep in mind there are none so blind as those who won't see.
J. Neil Schulman: The Unabridged Second Amendment
The people I call friends are of a like mind. They may not run in lock step with my views but they do think very closely as I do.
Life is far to short to spend energy/time on idiots that enjoy being idiots.
Surround your self with like minded people. Life becomes so much more pleasant.
Dont give up, keep hammering away, until the lightbulb comes on.
It's useless if he's either that ignorant or purposely intellectually dishonest.
Furthermore, the entire clause about the well regulated militia is a subordinate clause. Its function in the sentence is to provide an example why the right is necessary, not an all inclusive requirement or restriction on the right. The key part of the sentence was, is, and always will be "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
I had a conversation a couple of weeks ago with our IT guy. He's MAJORLY anti-gun, big-time liberal. Loves Obama.
Me (talking to someone else): Yeah, I'm gonna go shooting this weekend to see how my new gun performs out of the box and see if it would be one I would carry.
Him (no joke, this is what was said): I hate guns. Only p*****s have guns. They're for people who can't fight.
Me: So you don't wanna see a picture of my new toy?
I had a conversation a couple of weeks ago with our IT guy. He's MAJORLY anti-gun, big-time liberal. Loves Obama.
Me (talking to someone else): Yeah, I'm gonna go shooting this weekend to see how my new gun performs out of the box and see if it would be one I would carry.
Him (no joke, this is what was said): I hate guns. Only p*****s have guns. They're for people who can't fight.
Me: So you don't wanna see a picture of my new toy?
Sure. All sorts of articles, which are then declared to be biased and out of the proper context. It's frustrating as all get out.
Latest update: since there's no hyphen in the "well-regulated" in the Bill of Rights, it has a different meaning.
I told him that depending on which state Constitution or ratifying document you look at there are variously commas added or missing as well as the hyphen. So his entire argument stands on centuries-old transcription errors.
You can't make this stuff up.