Frank_N_Stein
Grandmaster
I'll go with you.Pretty certain that if (when) this choad gets a settlement (which I put on the City right now at 50/50), I'll be hanging it all up because it just wont be worth the fight anymore.
I'll go with you.Pretty certain that if (when) this choad gets a settlement (which I put on the City right now at 50/50), I'll be hanging it all up because it just wont be worth the fight anymore.
I had to change channels last night when this was on the news. I was running out of bad words.
Repeating the same ones several times is ok.
What you think about this for tomorrow morning?
I think it will work at the sentence modification tomorrow too.
Someone should warn the bailiffs to ready the tranquilizer darts.
The judge will take on look at him and say, "You've been watching Spaceballs again, haven't you?"
Given the truism that a man who represents himself has a fool for a client, that seems to fit.
Pretty certain that if (when) this choad gets a settlement (which I put on the City right now at 50/50), ...
Here's hoping Davis' judge reads the complaint in court, does a LOL, slaps Davis in his "right cranial" and dismisses the suit as frivolous, then struts out of the court room enroute to a trendy cocktail.
Giving this piece of **** anything but a bullet in the head is a disservice to the cop's family and to the public. You'd be sending a message that not only is it ok to shoot at / kill a cop but you also can get rewarded for it.
He should get rewarded... with a bullet.
Personally, I don't see a settlement happening in this case.
Personally, I don't see a dismissal happening in this case - at least not right away. Maybe on summary judgment, which will be in several months, maybe a year.
Here's how both of those points intersect: cop killer is going to want a bajillion dollars, plus interest. The cost to litigate this (not to mention the principle of the matter) will ALWAYS be less than what he wants. So, the City will litigate it and win.
This is not a situation IMHO where the cost of litigation would be more than the value of the case. Now, if the guy asked for $50k, then the hard conversations have to happen about the principle of the matter. Even then, I don't see Hogsett, who fostered a working relationship with LEOs as US Attorney, authorizing a settlement of any significance.
My handicapping of the odds of settlement: less than 5%.
.............
Indiana Supreme Court rejects Curry misconduct complaint in Perry Renn shooting | Fox 59
^^His momma was claiming that the officer was killed by a can of mace exploding, and not the bullet that pierced his lungs and heart. Filed some bs with the Indiana Supreme Court saying the autopsy was wrong (because she went to college) and it got denied and she doesn't even know if that's a good thing or a bad thing.
"It is my story and I think the whole world should know there's things that you all do not know about."
"We're being persecuted by these cops, sure we are criminals but we don't hurt nobody, we're innocent!"Cynthia Davis and her son's girlfriend, Latosha Ruffin, were targeted by IMPD and the HUD inspector general during an Oct. 9 raid as part of a public housing fraud investigation.
I'm with Hough's, absent some really bad facts for the city lurking out there, I would give it well under a 5% chance regardless of $amount.Pro Se prisoner case? I've never worked for Indy, but I have done cases for several Region governmental entities. Numbers be damned, given the facts of this case, a demand of $5k wouldn't draw a second look in my experience.
I got my 7th Circuit bar admission to do a Pro Se prisoner case with under a year's experience. Between the crappy facts and the PLRA, the deck is stacked against this a-hole getting anything.
I'll go with you.
Pro Se prisoner case? I've never worked for Indy, but I have done cases for several Region governmental entities. Numbers be damned, given the facts of this case, a demand of $5k wouldn't draw a second look in my experience.
I got my 7th Circuit bar admission to do a Pro Se prisoner case with under a year's experience. Between the crappy facts and the PLRA, the deck is stacked against this a-hole getting anything.
I'm with Hough's, absent some really bad facts for the city lurking out there, I would give it well under a 5% chance regardless of $amount.
Plus, if memory serves doesn't he fail as a matter of federal law if criminally convicted of the murder?