Any word on other new offerings yet, especially their longarms?
The disassembly/reassembly process was always the part that kept me from giving it a 100% recommendation for buyers. If they fixed that, then everyone looking for a new .22 should have one.
+1 on the ease of disassembly. Both of mine take a hammer to separate and reassemble.
Hmmm...when/where can I buy one?
I enjoy cleaning my guns. Actually find it relaxing.
Never had issues with Mk I or MK II.
If anything, the quirk of them made them more enjoyable.
I mastered the knack as a kid.
No big deal.
But in that it gives so many fits.............the ease of doing it on the older models, just adds even more satisfaction.
Super easy, and or dumbing things down, must be the new fun.
Finally a Ruger Mk for weak old people and nancy boys.
Finally a Ruger Mk for weak old people and nancy boys.
No doubt the same thing was said about automatic transmissions.
My 91-year-old FIL just bought a new car with a manual transmission, and he has never driven a car with any other type of drive train.
Dunno if there's a connection, but he also doesn't drive like a 91-year-old WWII veteran either, always the speed limit +5, even though he has an unblemished driving record.
From the video by .22Plinkster above:
-Much easier disassembly/reassembly
-No loaded chamber indicator
-Better trigger
-Drop-free magazines (better for competition)
-Replaceable grip panels
-Uses Mk III magazines
Hopper- I'm with you on the 22/45. I really like my Mk III 22/45. I'm betting they will come out with variations over time (longer barrel, lite, 22/45), but they can't fully develop/introduce everything at once. We'll have to wait our turns.