I figured, since I don't believe people should be required to take a class, and since I OC, I should get a Glock, so that I can be worse.
You want to know what's even worse than no required classes, OC, and Glocks?
I figured, since I don't believe people should be required to take a class, and since I OC, I should get a Glock, so that I can be worse.
You want to know what's even worse than no required classes, OC, and Glocks?
You want to know what's even worse than no required classes, OC, and Glocks?
You want to know what's even worse than no required classes, OC, and Glocks?
Rogue meteors ? Obamacare ?
Well, you have us in suspense....
No harm, no foul.
I'm sure Snapdragon is wondering why these Neanderthals jacked her thread, so, with that, I'm out.
the "force on force" training being referred to is not hand to hand type fighting. It's firearm training using simunition rounds, putting you into specific scenarios, where you actually use a firearm to shoot someone. See the website for midset labs, which is here in Indiana.
I found this yesterday.
Chainsaws….
Everyone knows you should not use something like a chainsaw if you do not know how to use it properly. Or if you think you might hurt yourself or someone else. It is the same with firearms. If you do not feel comfortable with one, either don’t have one or learn to use one properly.
Why Good People Should Be Armed - YouTube
Good analogy, 3steps.
Leaving in an hour. Had to shower and load the dishwasher and do a couple of loads of laundry first.
There is a solution to this "training required to carry" conundrum. Training is essential. At the same time we want to minimize infringements upon our essential liberties.
We require education for our kids. Make firearms training "common core" to the Indiana required curriculum. Then, everyone (raised in Indiana) is trained however carry isn't explicitly tied to whether or not you received training. Its sort of like mandatory civics education.
I couldnt disagree more more I don't want everyone to know how to properly use a weapon the kill rate/injured would go up in shootings
None, because the government does not have money, they would have to take it from someone else first